RE: Ad hominems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AB,

 

As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to ignore the correspondent.

 

Yours Irrespectively,

 

John

 

From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:44 PM
To: John C Klensin
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ad hominems

 

John,

 

The person have been in the IETF meeting remotely participating, and the current WGs agenda is not known how it was organised so the suggestion was based on past and current facts. 

 

Readers may assume the person is not experience but why do they assume that meeting don't need improvement or why they assume that current meeting agenda cannot be commented on or why they assume that IETF meeting are perfectly organised. 

 

IMHO If the comment was from some one else, many will change their mind just because he/she is popular experience not because of any other type of experience. 

 

AB

 

AB

 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]