Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, wrote:
This ongoing discussion of what constitutes an ad hominem argument is all very well,
but I'd like to point out that I didn't make an ad hominem argument or assertion.

I simply asked a question.


IMHO, you did do an ad hominem argument many times on IETF lists and I reported to IETF Chair and to another AD, before months about that, but still you continue and I cannot fix that situation if majority like that or if ADs cannot fix it. 

AB
 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]