Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:36:41 -0500
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Fb1-gka6WWGTAM7Tf2vRKZg8Ox0
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALaySJK8xBz6DeYNVv-Q5ctbSkoqOfZ9ZK-wKdtp3JvfmDbseg@mail.gmail.com> (Barry Leiba's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:49:37 -0500")
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)

As a matter of process, I'm confused about the handling of this appeal.
It sounds like Phil appealed the approval of RFC 7049.

That, I hope, was a decision made by the IESG, not a decision made by
one AD.
So, I'm failing to understand how it makes sense for you to respond to
this appeal as an AD.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
  - From: Barry Leiba

References:
- Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
  - From: Barry Leiba

Prev by Date: Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
Next by Date: Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
Previous by thread: Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
Next by thread: Re: Appeal from Phillip Hallam-Baker on the publication of RFC 7049 on the Standards Track
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]