Hi Barry,
At 13:10 19-02-2014, Barry Leiba wrote:
Phill took the first step of addressing his complaint to the
responsible AD (me). This is my response. If he or someone else
should choose to pursue a further appeal, the next step would be to
take it to the IESG by way of the Chair.
Selective quoting:
"During the November IETF meeting, I received an appeal from Phillip
Hallam-Baker to the publication of CBOR, RFC 7049, on the Standards
Track."
RFC 7049 was published in October 2013. As Sam Hartman mentioned it
was a decision of the IESG.
"Phill is questioning the process;"
That falls under the IESG.
The handling of the appeal is odd.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy