Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> (Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> Implementers do not do anything with a CPS pointer in a policy
>>> qualifier.  So, this addition will not impact interoperability.
>> in other words it has no operational use
> It has a legal significance.

rhetorical question: in what juristiction(s)?

from 2804

   - The IETF, an international standards body, believes itself to be
     the wrong forum for designing protocol or equipment features that
     address needs arising from the laws of individual countries,
     because these laws vary widely across the areas that IETF standards
     are deployed in.  Bodies whose scope of authority correspond to a
     single regime of jurisdiction are more appropriate for this task.

this song has been repeated.

randy





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]