The draft says:
R-4: The UE MUST decrement the TTL when passing packets between IPv6
links across the UE.
It should say Hop Limit instead.
The LAN link originated RA message carries a copy of the following
3GPP radio link received RA message option fields:
o MTU (if not provided by the 3GPP network, the UE will provide its
3GPP link MTU size)
o Prefix Information
I doubt the MTU on the LAN should the same as on the WAN... they're
different in nature.
Below is the general procedure for this scenario:
1. The user activates router functionality for a LAN on the UE.
but continues to act as a Host when receiving an RA to configure a next
hop for the default route.
Alex
Le 07/02/2014 16:20, The IESG a écrit :
The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
consider the following document:
- 'Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LAN
link'
<draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document describes requirements for extending an IPv6 /64 prefix
from a User Equipment 3GPP radio interface to a LAN link as well as
two implementation examples.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.