Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-02-06 04:56, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>>> B.  Proposed Additions to the Plan
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> 	5.4.1 Subpoenas and Other Legal Requests
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> 	All subpoenas and other legal requests received by the IAOC
>>>>> >>>> 	or the IETF will be published on the IAOC website together
>>>>> >>>> 	with their responses.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> 	Reason for Change:  Greater transparency.
>>>> >>> Some such requests may include the requirement that they not be
>>>> >>> revealed.
>>> >> 
>>> >> they should be rejected out of hand.  "we can not read your email"
>> > 
>> > Does that work for National Security Letters too?
>
> i was thinking of them specifically.  and yes, i have gone to jail for
> my political beliefs in the past and would do so again.

A "we have problems here" response for me would trigger a request to
review under what jurisdiction IETF operate.

We are a standards body that writes documents.

Not an operator or such that deals with operational issues.

   Patrik


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]