Re: Problem with new Note Well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problem with new Note Well
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:44:03 +0200
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx Mailing List" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, IESG IESG <iesg@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19AAADA2-8E3B-456F-B0CE-9A27D2BB5FE9@piuha.net>

For your information, as a temporary measure we have pulled back the change and the web site (registration etc) should now display the old note well text.

Jari

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

References:
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: ned+ietf
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Problem with new Note Well
  - From: Jari Arkko

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09
Previous by thread: RE: Problem with new Note Well
Next by thread: Re: Problem with new Note Well
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]