On 1/16/14, 9:19 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Hi, > > On 2014-1-16, at 18:06, joel jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> These tunnels are stateless > > yep. (But they don't have to be.) They do in-fact have to be stateless with respect to the contents. They will no doubt be created in a same distributed forwarding engines that currently do IP-MPLS encapsulation and L2-MPLS encapsulation. likewise their decapsulation will occur in such devices. > Look at it the other way: if transport area folks would want to send > MPLS packets into the network in some problematic way, I'm sure the > routing and ops folks would not be amused. Today congestion occurs on MPLS networks. intermediate hops that are congested have no choice but to drop packets. > Lars >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature