Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

["Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Isn't that basically the problem of the inner traffic sender, not the 
problem of the tunnel that is carrying the traffic?
Asking tunnel's to solve the problem of applications with undesirable 
behavior seems backwards.

Yours,
Joel

On 1/14/14 10:20 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On 2014-1-14, at 15:20, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes, the inner (real) transport header is the only meaningful place
> > to apply congestion avoidance.
>
> But what if the inner traffic isn't congestion controlled?
>
> Lars