Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:27:54 +0100
Cc: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <tslzjmzvbij.fsf@mit.edu>

I like the proposed addition (but would also like to avoid the example, which had several issues people have already pointed out).

Jari

References:
- draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
  - From: Sam Hartman

Prev by Date: Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
Next by Date: Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
Previous by thread: Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
Next by thread: Re: draft-farrell-perpass-attack architecture issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]