On Friday, January 10, 2014 08:24:02 PM Gregory Mirsky wrote: > Hi Lars, > I think that " The whole point of running MPLS is to > create networks in which paths are provisionable, so > this is usually not an issue." is only partially > correct. LDP-based MPLS network is not provisionable and > LSPs follow IP best route selection. Explicit signaling > of LSP is achievable in (G)MPLS by using RSVP(-TE) > signaling. Greg, I think we can delineate provisioning from whether it is dynamic or explicit. MPLS LSP's are all pre-provisioned, because of the FEC's created. Whether those FEC's are dynamically or explicitly provisioned is a separate issue. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.