Re: [lisp] [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "<l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:37:04 -0800
Cc: "<mark.tinka@xxxxxxxxx>" <mark.tinka@xxxxxxxxx>, "<mpls@xxxxxxxx>" <mpls@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "lisp@xxxxxxxx" <lisp@xxxxxxxx>, "gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "david.black@xxxxxxx" <david.black@xxxxxxx>, "jnc@xxxxxxx" <jnc@xxxxxxx>, "tsvwg@xxxxxxxx" <tsvwg@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346BE@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>

> Do any routers count TCP/UDP checksum failures, much less
> expose the count via SNMP?

Typically they do but only for packets destined to them. Much like hosts would check the header checksum. 

Dino

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [lisp] [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: l.wood

References:
- gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: Black, David
- RE: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- RE: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: l.wood
- Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: Mark Tinka
- RE: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: l.wood

Prev by Date: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
Previous by thread: RE: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
Next by thread: RE: [lisp] [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]