Re: misdelivered mpls packets - Was: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: misdelivered mpls packets - Was: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 06:32:22 +0900
Cc: gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx, tsvwg@xxxxxxxx, david.black@xxxxxxx, jnc@xxxxxxx, stbryant@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201401092048.16168.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

what may scare me most about this discussion is the lack of p in mpls
vns.  you just sent my very sensitive unencrypted packet to some very
bad place.

Attachment: pgpuGDzu4vADi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
  - From: Mark Tinka
- misdelivered mpls packets - Was: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
  - From: Loa Andersson
- Re: misdelivered mpls packets - Was: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
  - From: Mark Tinka

Prev by Date: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: misdelivered mpls packets - Was: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
Next by thread: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]