Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, January 09, 2014 02:08:43 PM Stewart Bryant 
wrote:

> Either or both.

I can only speak to native MPLS, as I've never run tunneled 
MPLS.

> I am interested in how often in practice MPLS packets get
> misdelivered due to label corruption.

Well, first of all, routers would need to report corrupted 
MPLS frames so operators can glean this data. This isn't 
something I've come across, but it would be good to find 
some kind of way to count this across interfaces, if the 
routers can detect and report them.

The known issue about mis-delivery of MPLS frames is poorly-
sized MTU interfaces. I have no empirical data as to how 
this can corrupt successive MPLS frames that may fit into 
the transit MTU. But in this case, as with any Layer 2 
traffic, not enough MTU = dropped frame.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]