Jari, you can’t be serious. unlimited means -without- limit, not just the limits of your imagination. Patrick, perhaps more to the point, the ramifications (consequence analysis) of managing transitions between variable code/address realms. Its not just expansion, its flow between larger/smaller, and smaller/larger. we are back to NAT/ALGs _again_ /bill Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. On 4January2014Saturday, at 1:31, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4 jan 2014, at 09:29, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> One important change is that every future application protocol proposal should be required to have an effectively unlimited code space for assignment. >> >> Agree. > > I do not agree regarding the term "unlimited". > > What is needed is that the specification do have a consequence analysis regarding expansion of use. > > Patrik >