Re: 2013 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For IETF WGs: there was some individual documents sent to some related
> WGs for review but still not much responses (this needs more
> encouraging), and ADs or Chairs do try to mention to their WGs about
> related issues in other works, but still no method for cross-WGs
> involved other than AD announcements. No much interaction between IESG
> and WGs, usually done through Chairs or authors, but still some times
> in some issues the WG is excluded.


I personally think this is a WG-by-WG issue, and a lot rests on the
efforts of the ADs and relevant WG chairs to make sure that issues of
joint interest get cross-pollinated between WGs. There's been a lot of
work done in the routing area by the ADs and WG chairs to make sure
that WG participants are aware of related drafts or issues in other
WGs in the area. I agree that in general, cross-area interaction could
use a lot of work.

Cheers,
Andy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]