On 12/15/13, 16:01 , S Moonesamy wrote:
Hi Dave,
At 12:54 15-12-2013, Dave Crocker wrote:
Small suggestion is to add (rough), so that a casual reader won't miss
that our version of consensus does not mean unanimity.
Thanks for the feedback (and to Arturo too). I'll get back to this in a
day or two as there are some other suggested changes.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Thank you, this incorporates the concepts I was looking for.
I like Dave's suggestion. Another small suggestion, the paragraph uses
both "person" and "participant". I wonder if it wouldn't be a little
cleaner to use only one or the other.
Even without any additional changes, it looks much better now.
Thanks.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: farmer@xxxxxxx
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================