Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: IETF-Discussion Discussion <
ietf@xxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
From
: Tim Bray <
tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:14:51 -0800
Delivered-to
:
ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E51037AB@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk
>
Just for the record: I fully support advancing a future version of draft-farrell-perpass-attack to BCP, noting that there have been some useful improvements to the current draft proposed in this discussion.
References
:
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
From:
Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
From:
t.p.
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
From:
Brian E Carpenter
RE: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
From:
l.wood
Prev by Date:
Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03.txt> (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date:
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
Previous by thread:
RE: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
Next by thread:
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]