Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:01:30 -0800
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "rtcweb@xxxxxxxx" <rtcweb@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52A7A255.6050409@nostrum.com>

On 10 December 2013 15:23, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Then light a candle.

I continue to do this, but still find myself agreeing with Matthew.

References:
- RE: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
  - From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
  - From: Magnus Westerlund
- RE: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
  - From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
  - From: Adam Roach

Prev by Date: RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Next by Date: Re: https at ietf.org
Previous by thread: RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Next by thread: RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]