On 6 Dec 2013, at 8:31 pm, t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I oppose publication of this I-D by the IETF. > > The point has already been that better defences against monitoring > likely means greater use of encryption and encryption is at times > harmful. … > Encryption has its dangers and the IETF should not be encouraging its > widespread adoption. The strings “encryption” and “encrypt” doesn’t appear in the draft; the closest it comes is the reference to RFC1984, whose name includes “crypt”. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/