Cullen, On 5 Dec 2013, at 16:56, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Given the hum in the IETF plenary at the last IETF, I no longer think this document represents IETF consensus. Given the hum in RTCWeb working group, I doubt this represents the consensus of the RAI area either. > > I think I would be tempted to resolve this by saying for each different scenario RTP is used in (SIP, RTSP, Mulitcast etc) exactly how it needs to be secured and for scenarios not listed such as new usages, what the requirements are. For something like SIP, having just one way to secure RTP is much better than having many ways. I'm confused about your objection, since this draft states that we need to do exactly as you propose. Colin -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/