Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "<l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:27:57 -0500
Cc: ietf-http-wg@xxxxxxxx, perpass <perpass@xxxxxxxx>, bruce@xxxxxxxxxx, IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103798@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>

On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:17 PM, <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Universal encryption is not a a laudable goal.

Unsupported assertions are not helpful.

References:
- IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00
  - From: IAB Chair
- perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
  - From: Bruce Perens
- RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
  - From: l.wood

Prev by Date: RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
Next by Date: Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
Previous by thread: RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
Next by thread: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]