> Subject: Re: https at ietf.org Date: Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:52:45AM -0800 Quoting ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > Encouraging the use of our work - our standards - is exactly the issue here. > > You're trying to impose privacy requirements on a use-case where they simply > > don't make sense. > Given this years revelations in the privacy field that is a statement I find slightly bold. You'll have to explain the connection then, because I don't see it. We're talking about refusing to allow unprotected access to public standards documents. That's the use-case in question; nothing else. Ned