Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Nottingham writes:

> Consensus around this text was particularly hard-won; unless there
> is a very good reason to make a change, I'd rather not risk falling
> into that rat-hole again.

And, I should add in case it helps at all, that the W3C TAG was
involved in the extensive discussions which resulted in this text.

I also think the fact that it is where it is, in 3.1.1.5, does matter.

But recapitulating and/or referencing it in the Security
Considerations section would of course be fine, and indeed probably
desireable.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxx
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]