>> Oh, and, of course, if we use my suggestion below, this document will >> have to "update" 6410 as well as 2026. > > It will "obsolete" both 6410 and 2026. It's replacing them. No, I don't think so. It's replacing specific sections of them, but not the whole documents. I think we'd have a very hard time getting consensus on a full replacement of 2026. Barry