On 24 okt. 2013, at 15:29, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards > I-D: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-04 > > Reviewed by: D. Crocker > Date: 24 October 2013 > > > Summary: > > This draft offers revised normative text for the criteria used to > qualify IETF drafts as entry-level Proposed Standards status. The > draft's background discussion makes a number of assertions of fact > without substantiation, at least two of which are probably not correct. > The revised normative text includes two criteria that also are likely > inaccurate. > > The draft is not ready for approval. > Based on these comments and the comments made during the IESG ballot I’ve made changes to the document. Just posted as: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-05 See Appendix B.6 for a somewhat detailed in-document log of the changes or the excellent diff tool: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-05.txt There was a suggestion to remove the characterization of Internet Standard (for completeness) I think that is a matter of taste and not of content. More a matter of content is Dave’s (off-list) suggestion to remove section 4: That section is result of a discussion on the IETF list between Sep 3 and 13 and addresses the worries about setting the bar to high for publication. I believe that with this version all is addressed and we’ve arrived at if not consensus, then only ripply consensus, certainly not rough…. but off course Jari/IESG is the judge of that. Over (and out?) —Olaf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail