This I-D specifies an IANA entry with server-generated-key | [RFC-ietf-pkix-est] Section 4.4.2 | with a note to replace RFC-ietf-pkix-est in the table above with the RFC number assigned to draft-ietf-pkix-est. Should this be RFC7030? Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>; <smime@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:44 PM > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Creation of a registry for smime-type parameter values' > <draft-leiba-smime-type-registry-01.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2013-11-28. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) defined the > Content-Type parameter "smime-type". As the list of defined values > for that parameter has increased, it has become clear that a registry > is needed to document those values. This document creates that > registry, registers the current values, and specifies the policies > for registration of new values. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-smime-type-registry/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-smime-type-registry/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > >