RE: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don’t see how that is possible.  Different SDOs have different focus areas with clear interdependencies between the work.  We don’t need to try to replicate the work happening elsewhere, but rather should continue to play nice with other SDOs.  It would be really hard to get all of the various experts needed attend multiple forums because one SDO didn’t want to reference the work they did in another SDO. 

 

Regards,

Kathleen

 

From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:04 PM
To: ietf
Cc: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards

 

I don't agree with comparing our standards with other SDO standards within our work, or even making our work process depend on other SDO products. IETF RFC should try its best to have normative references that are RFCs not dependent/government oriented. We may end up with a new name for our IETF, as dependent IETF (DIETF).

 

AB


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]