Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:18:07 -0600
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, "<ietf@xxxxxxxx>" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <151B3C7B-907C-494F-B5FA-2D70C93EF2B4@nominum.com>

On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What happened at PyCon is a really strong argument for having an escalation path other than twitter. 

+1

References:
- Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: IETF Chair
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Ted Lemon

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
Next by Date: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Next by thread: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]