Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:36:31 -0800
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <151B3C7B-907C-494F-B5FA-2D70C93EF2B4@nominum.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 10/22/13 6:15 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> What happened at PyCon is a really strong argument for having an
> escalation path other than twitter.   

That is a very, very, very good point.

Melinda

References:
- Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: IETF Chair
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  - From: Ted Lemon

Prev by Date: Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
Next by Date: Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Next by thread: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]