Re: Time between meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fair enough. By the way, this was in no way meant as a critizism of the scribe or minutes takers, they did a great job.

On Aug 2, 2013, at 12:24, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
>    Or eat less cookies.  :)
> 
>    Now, seriously. I think in your case, it was just bad luck to chair to
> meetings one after the other.
> 
>    For the rest, taking punctuality more seriously would help.
> 
>    As you said, time is scarce and I prefer to use it in meetings than in
> breaks.
> 
> my 20 cents,
> as
> 
> On 8/2/13 10:28 AM, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I chaired two afternoon sessions on Thursday, and I think that the 10
>> minutes break between the sessions were not enough. Not only had I to
>> rush to the other room to set up my laptop etc., but also the scribes
>> and minutes takers that have volunteered for the second session were
>> not yet there (they arrived about 5 minutes after meeting start), so
>> that I had to find new volunteers at the beginning of the meeting. I
>> know that the available meeting time is very sparse, but having 20
>> minutes between meetings could avoid that.
>> 
>> Ulrich
>> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]