Re: IAB Statement on Dotless Domains

["Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There must be something similar to Godwin's Law whereby any IETF discussion can devolve into a debate over NAT. ;-)

Jason

On 7/12/13 10:13 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Keith, read my words, I choose them more carefully than you imagine.

solves their problems at negligible cost TO THEM

What part of that do you disagree with? I don't dispute the fact that NAT is a suboptimal solution if we look at the system as a whole. But the reason I deployed NAT in my house was that Roadrunner wanted $10 extra per month for every device I connected to a maximum of 4. I have over 200 IP enabled devices in my house.