Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:30:34 -0400
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51CF38EB.3080409@dougbarton.us>

Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I don't understand the concern about too many message headers."

References:
- RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
  - From: Noel Chiappa
- Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
  - From: Doug Barton

Prev by Date: Fwd: Who use online office software ,such as Google drive ,Microsoft office 365, Do you think it need break the information island？
Next by Date: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
Previous by thread: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
Next by thread: RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]