Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alejandro,
At 05:42 27-06-2013, alejandroacostaalamo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
First, as a comment, I guess there is people who follow more IETF remotely than other in place.

Yes.

Here's is an extract from a Jabber log:

  "I don't think I've seen a WG chatroom this full before
   Well the future of the free world is at stake here :-)"

  Second, I like this idea of changing the threshold.

Thanks for reading the draft and providing feedback.

Third, In the other hand, since there are several positions that are fill using this RFC maybe we can place a testbed. 50% can be fill using the current way and 50% using the proposed way, sounds crazy but it might be a good beginning.

I don't think that it sounds crazy. A good beginning is when people make suggestions like you did. I don't know yet whether I will say okay to the idea. I would like to read all the suggestions, including yours, and then decide.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]