Re: SHOULD and RECOMMENDED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
> RECOMMENDED is a strong suggestion that the implementation may override at
> the discretion of the implementer. SHOULD is normative.
> 
> So the first tells me that I can make up my own mind, the second says that
> I should give a reason if I don't comply.

This is only half of the story.

PKIX (rfc5280) defines the concept of a "minimum requirements RP",
i.e. an implementation which implements only MUSTs, and potentially not
a single SHOULD.  Essentially, this waters down all SHOULDs to MAYs.

-Martin




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]