Re: SHOULD and RECOMMENDED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



They are not synonyms

Lets go back to 1980:

Implementations SHOULD support DES
vs
RECOMMENDED encryption algorithms: DES, IDEA


There are many specifications that specify crypto algorithms that should not. JOSE and XML Signature should not have required algorithms or even SHOULD language. The protocols that are built on the specifications are where the normative language belongs. 




On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/22/2013 10:28 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
    I believe that it would be wise to discourage
    "RECOMMENDED" and "NOT RECOMMENDED" as synonyms for "SHOULD" and
    "SHOULD NOT" unless they are clearly necessary to avoid awkward
    sentences and the non-A/S intent is completely clear.


A fine suggestion, with which I agree.


For normative vocabulary, synonyms are sinful.

d/


--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net



--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]