On 06/12/2013 10:56 PM, l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Are the IESG people who disagree with you speaking for the IESG, or for themselves? That's really not clear already? In any case, I was disagreeing with Pete as an individual since he was wrong regardless of hats. He and I do that all the time and both find it amusing:-) > I've noticed a tendency for IESG weight to be (inadvertently?) thrown around, lending more weight to comments than would otherwise be given. I've not noticed that. Maybe I perceive things differently of course, but people ought know not to take opinions any more or less seriously just because someone's on some I* thing at the moment. S. > > Lloyd Wood > http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ > > > ________________________________________ > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Resnick [presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 12 June 2013 20:17 > To: Bob Hinden > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Content-free Last Call comments > > On 6/12/13 10:33 AM, Bob Hinden wrote: >> Please describe the context of your email. Are you speaking for the IESG, yourself as an AD, or an individual? > > Oh, crap. And given that I'm usually the one giving people a hard time > about *this* issue, I feel especially bad about not being clearer. > > This is Pete, hatless individual talking. There are (as you've seen) > IESG people, past and present who disagree with me. Nothing I've said is > anything we've come to an IESG consensus around. Insofar as I think that > only saying "I support this document" is a bogus thing to say, I am > revealing something about how I behave as an AD in the face of such > statements, and my further explanations that I value reviews and take > them seriously also indicates my views as an AD, but that doesn't > indicate some policy that I'm instituting with WGs for which I am > responsible. > > I am terribly sorry about not making this clear up front. My sincere > apologies. I hope nobody took this as a other than my commentary. > > Sheepishly, > pr > > -- > Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 > > >