I received an IESG message asking my comments so I gave it, regard to your comments below, the reply is that I refer to missing information needed in the I-D, so the reveiw suggests that there is something missing. Did not suggested text because I know that it most probably not be considered. The Last call ends by 06.06.2013 so I still am in this date, not sure why you close, AB On 6/6/13, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I find it somewhat disruptive that this email raises new questions on a > draft > authored in a working group in which you participate, and that it has > arrived > after the end of IETF last call. > > I see a series of questions in this message, but no suggested textual > changes. I > therefore conclude that you are requesting no changes and none shall be > made. > > Thank you. > Adrian > >> Reply to your request dated 24/05/2013 >> I-D: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03 >> Draft Reviewed By: Abdussalam Baryun (AB) Dated:06/06/2013 >> Reviewer Comment A3: Use Cases not considered and the Information Bases >> Threats. >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> *Use-cases threats* > >