Re: When to adopt a WG I-D

To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 23:19:06 -0800
Cc: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <035101ce5d05$aba61110$02f23330$@olddog.co.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 5/29/13 11:16 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Which is why this isn't a process document.

Are you sure?

Melinda

References:
- When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Joe Touch
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Melinda Shore
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D
  - From: Adrian Farrel