Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/29/13 11:38 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> I think this is one of the best discussions of what we're about
> that I've seen anywhere, and I'm grateful to John for working this
> through.
> 
> One thing I'd like to take up further is this:
> 
> On 5/29/13 9:23 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> Similarly, we sometimes hear it argued that we should accept a 
>> specification for Proposed Standard unchanged because it has been
>> extensively developed and reviewed elsewhere.  That may be 
>> reasonable in some cases although I'd hope we wouldn't make it a
>> common practice.  But, if a specification adopted for Proposed
>> Standard on that basis is then proposed for advancement to
>> Internet Standard, I think the review should be comprehensive
>> --perhaps even more comprehensive than the usual such review--
>> because the Internet Standard is unambiguously an IETF product
>> and recommendation not that of the other body.
> 
> I'd actually much prefer to see these go to informational, if 
> they're to be published.  Otherwise I agree - if something's going 
> to be an IETF standard it needs to go through the IETF standards 
> development review and revision process, which is probably not what
> the authors want.

/me wonders if we need a separate series for informational documentation

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=sjcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]