Not related to the draft as such (whose publication, incidentally, I support): On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:23:03PM +0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > 1 - intro - do we have a standard way to refer to the dns specs as tuned > in 42 subsequent rfcs since 1035? Alas, no. Some time ago, DNSEXT was re-vivified in an effort to write a "protocol profile" that would have been a nice roll-up document to do this. But there was no energy to get the work done and the drafts languished for months without any changes. It still seems a worthwhile project, but there is no evidence that we have a population interested enough to do the work. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx