On May 16, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think Dave's idea is worth looking at, but have one comment: > > On 05/16/2013 09:46 PM, Yoav Nir wrote: >> There is a problem, though, that this will increase the load on ADs. > > There is that. But don't forget that ADs mostly read everything > in IESG review and often comment. Even leaving aside DISCUSSes, > if every IETF LC draft got a bunch of AD review comments, then > the IETF LC would be much busier than now. And its in the nature > of IETFers to chime in. So this would I suspect increase everyone's > load, if it works, and not just ADs. More community participation at IETF last call is a good thing. The problem with AD's time is that they will need to review at IETF last call, and then may need to review again after some changes have been made (including changes not related to their own issue). That's where the increased AD load comes from. Yoav