Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave - I hope you'll indulge my selective quoting as I have a couple of specific points to address.  My apologies if I end up quoting you out of context...

On May 16, 2013, at 12:23 PM 5/16/13, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [...]
> 
> So here's a simple proposal that pays attention to AD workload and includes a simple efficiency hack:
> 
>     When the IETF Last Call is issued, wait a few days, to see whether any serious issues are raised by the community.  The really serious ones usually are raised quickly.  If there are none, it's pretty certain the document will advance to an IESG vote.  That leaves 7-10 days of IETF Last Call for ADs to get educated and ask questions, just like everyone else.
> 
> Jari has expressed the goal of having AD concerns be raised more publicly.  Moving AD review and comment to the IETF Last Call venue nicely accomplishes this, too.

I just posted elsewhere a suggestion to move this review even earlier, to WG last call.  Accomplishes most of the same ends, while putting the discussion in front of the IETF participants who are, presumably, most invested in the resulting document.

> 
> 
> [...]
> In terms of quality assurance, the idea that we have a process that relies on the sudden insight of a single AD, at the end of a many-month process, is broken.  It's fine if that person sees something that everyone else has missed until then, but that is quite different from designing a process that is claimed to rely on it.

As you and I have discussed in person, I am 100% in agreement with this comment.  As much as I liked to think of myself, when I was an AD, as a rock-god Network Expert with complete and in-depth insight into every document I reviewed, I know the reality was that any problems I might have found were related to the old observation that "even a blind squirrel finds an acorn occasionally".
> 
> And of course, the reality is that we allow bad specs out the door all the time; we just allow fewer of them than many/most other standards bodies...

You're such an optimist.

- Ralph

> 
> d/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]