Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Loa Andersson <loa@xxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:07:34 -0400
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5194E565.3000200@pi.nu>

Please distinguish between (1) making the system efficient and (2) making individual documents go through it quickly. If you put time limits on parts of the process, you're not allowing them to function correctly. Putting arbitrary time limits on will hurry things up but it will not produce higher quality results.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun

References:
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
  - From: Loa Andersson

Prev by Date: Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
Next by Date: Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
Previous by thread: Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
Next by thread: Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]