Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2013-05-16 14:38, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:

Discussions should have a time limit (can be one week),

I totally disagree, DISCUSSES are our friends, they need to be
discussed until we have rough consensus; it seems to be a
manifestly bad idea to draw a deadline after seven days, if
someone come up with a satisfactory solution on the eighth.

99,9% of the DISCUSSES improve our documents or the understanding
of them.

/Loa


like we have
in meetings (2hours), if there is time we can know when things are
needed to respond to, I usually ignore when there is no milestones or
planing-time. Does IESG have milestones for documents
processing/discussions?



--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@xxxxx
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]