Hi Mark,
At 15:57 04-05-2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
The publisher can choose to interoperate with everyone by publishing
both.
The client side can choose to interoperate with everyone by looking
for both.
Both side can choose their level of interoperability. There is no
bug.
Thanks for the feedback.
Based on the quoted text I would write the text as:
(i) you must have X and Y where X and Y are identical.
(ii) I ask you for both X and Y (see [1] for example).
Item (i) is a combination of the previous items (a) and (c). Item
(ii) is the last part of previous item (d).
At 16:26 04-05-2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
Additionally it supports all implementions from pre RFC 4088 through
to the desired end state of type SPF only.
B.T.W. the next point releases of named (at rc2 now) warns if SHOULD
have both is not being done.
Noted.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79114.html