On May 4, 2013, at 10:26 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> However, that is a bit of a problem, because I think it's fairly rare for documents to get additional "review" at last call time. Changing the name probably won't fix that. > It feels like unless something is particularly controversial that the likelihood of it getting useful review other than solicited ones during last call has actually gone down. If it's fully cooked, and sometime it seems that they aren't, that lack of commentary does not indicate consensus or readiness in particular. By "last call time" I was referring to IETF last call, not WGLC. I am painfully familiar with "we'll do a WGLC to see if we can get some review."