Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/05/2013 05:59, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> The blog nicely classes the problem as being too heavy-weight during
> final stages.  The quick discussion thread seems focused on adding a
> moment at which the draft specification is considered 'baked'.
> 
> I think that's still too late.

What, you agree with your younger self?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-icar-sirs-01

Apart from the non-diverse acronym, I still think that proposal
was a good one.

    Brian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]