Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/2013 1:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 02/05/2013 05:59, Dave Crocker wrote:

The blog nicely classes the problem as being too heavy-weight during
final stages.  The quick discussion thread seems focused on adding a
moment at which the draft specification is considered 'baked'.

I think that's still too late.

What, you agree with your younger self?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-icar-sirs-01

I really dislike being consistent, and always have.


Apart from the non-diverse acronym, I still think that proposal
was a good one.

Me too.  Could be interesting to, ummmm, review it for updating...

d/


--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]